Original publication
Start with the filing, statement, data release, policy decision, exchange notice, or issuer announcement that created the news.
This page is a verification framework, not a breaking-news feed. A useful market note links to the original publication, records when it became available, identifies the exact affected instrument, separates facts from interpretation, and states what would confirm or invalidate the thesis.
Reviewed September 2026
Accurate news can still lead to an incorrect market thesis. Prices can gap, liquidity can disappear, and leveraged products can amplify losses. Verify the source, instrument, timestamp, and maximum cash risk before acting.
Start with the filing, statement, data release, policy decision, exchange notice, or issuer announcement that created the news.
Use reporting to understand context and competing interpretations, while retaining the original document as the factual reference.
Treat summaries, screenshots, and reposts as discovery tools. They can omit qualifiers, use old material, or attach the wrong timestamp.
Confirm the reaction on the exact instrument and time window. A related symbol is not proof of the same executable price or risk.
Write what the source actually reports without adding a directional label, motive, or certainty that the document does not contain.
Explain why the fact might matter for this market, including the assumptions connecting the event to price.
Name the observable market condition and time window required before the scenario becomes active.
Name the price, time, source correction, or contradictory evidence that ends the scenario. Do not rewrite it after the fact.
No. This page explains how to verify market information. Use the linked primary sources and a trusted licensed news service for current reporting.
No. Verification establishes what happened, not what price must do. Expectations, positioning, liquidity, other news, and product differences can produce a muted or opposite reaction.
They help establish whether the market could already have known the information, whether a post is recycling old material, and which price window is relevant.
Mark the claim unverified and avoid treating it as a decision input. Preserve the link or screenshot for follow-up, but do not upgrade repetition into evidence.
Require a source, timestamp, confirmation, invalidation, and status before making an independent decision.