Index comparison

US30 vs
NAS100.

Compare each benchmark’s current methodology, then inspect the exact product used to obtain exposure.

48%
Positive · latest 50
351
Published outcomes
50
Rolling sample
Open
Positive + non-positive
Publisher-reported rolling sample. A positive-record rate is not a return; outcome size, costs, and execution matter. Not independently audited. View the complete results
US30 Signals app screenshot
Direct comparison

S&P Dow Jones Indices describes the DJIA as a price-weighted measure of 30 U.S. blue-chip companies. Nasdaq defines the Nasdaq-100 around 100 of the largest eligible Nasdaq-listed non-financial companies using modified market-cap weighting. US30 and NAS100 are often provider-defined derivatives rather than official benchmark symbols.

Reviewed September 2026

Use this page to
  • Check each provider’s current methodology and constituent data.
  • Do not convert company count or sector labels into a timeless volatility ranking.
  • Identify the exact future, fund, option, or CFD and its price source.
  • Calculate cash risk from that product’s multiplier, costs, and invalidation level.

Index methodology does not predict performance. Linked futures and CFDs can be leveraged and differ in price, hours, costs, settlement, and legal terms. Verify the exact instrument before making a decision.

Benchmark rules

Company selection and weighting are the core differences.

01

DJIA

A selected, price-weighted basket of 30 U.S. blue-chip companies. Higher share prices generally create more index influence before divisor adjustments.

02

Nasdaq-100

A rules-based benchmark designed around 100 of the largest eligible Nasdaq-listed non-financial companies using modified market-cap weighting.

03

Composition changes

Both constituent sets and weights can change. Use current official publications rather than a permanent sector or company list.

04

No automatic direction

Index construction explains exposure; it does not determine which benchmark will outperform or how either will react next.

Tradable products

Similar index exposure can hide different mechanics.

01

YM and MYM

Dated Dow futures with CME-defined multipliers, minimum ticks, settlement, and expiry.

02

NQ and MNQ

Dated Nasdaq-100 futures with different CME multipliers and tick values from the Dow contracts.

03

Funds and options

Shares, fees, holdings, strikes, premiums, and settlement make them distinct from the index and from futures.

04

US30 and NAS100 CFDs

Broker-defined point values, hours, spreads, financing, and rollover mean the label alone is not a specification.

Frequently asked questions

Is US30 always less volatile than NAS100?+

No. Volatility depends on the period, measurement, and product. Compare like-for-like data over a stated window instead of relying on a permanent label.

Are US30 and the DJIA exactly the same thing?+

The DJIA is the official benchmark. US30 is commonly a broker’s derivative label and can have provider-specific price construction and contract terms.

Can a Dow level be used unchanged on YM, MYM, and a US30 CFD?+

Confirm the quote, timestamp, contract month, multiplier, and execution costs first. Related products can show different executable levels and risk.

Where can I verify the futures multipliers?+

Use current CME product specifications. The linked US30 futures reference summarises YM and MYM and links to the official source.

Index methodology does not predict performance. Linked futures and CFDs can be leveraged and differ in price, hours, costs, settlement, and legal terms. Verify the exact instrument before making a decision.
Dow Jones Averages methodologyOfficial DJIA objective and weighting rules. Nasdaq-100 methodologyOfficial Nasdaq-100 objective and rules. What is US30?Separate the DJIA from broker-labelled products. YM and MYM referenceProduct-specific multipliers and tick values.

Compare the benchmark. Verify the contract.

Use product-specific prices, multipliers, costs, and invalidation when measuring risk.